Rethinking Vestibular Recovery: Why Adaptation, Not Just Habituation, Holds the Key

Photo by Juan Rumimpunu on Unsplash

Decoding Vestibular Recovery Mechanisms

As a physical therapist specializing in vestibular and balance disorders, and in my role as National Director of Vestibular Education & Training at FYZICAL, I play a crucial role in guiding my patients toward the most effective strategies for recovery. I'm constantly exploring the most effective approach to help my patients regain their footing and overcome the debilitating effects of dizziness and imbalance. While "habituation" has long been a cornerstone of vestibular rehabilitation, a deeper understanding of the underlying recovery mechanisms, as highlighted in a key article by Lacour and Bernard-Demanze (2015), points towards the critical importance of adaptation. To optimize recovery, we must understand the nuances and limitations of how the brain and body can respond to vestibular challenges.

The Scientific Framework: Restoration, Adaptation, and Habituation

Our understanding of how vestibular function recovers is strongly supported by research, particularly the review article "Interaction between vestibular compensation mechanisms and vestibular rehabilitation therapy: 10 recommendations for optimal functional recovery" by Michel Lacour and Laurence Bernard-Demanze, published in Frontiers in Neurology on 06 January 2015. According to Lacour and Bernard-Demanze, vestibular function can be restored through three distinct mechanisms: restoration, adaptation, and habituation. A comprehensive grasp of these processes, including their strengths and potential drawbacks, is fundamental to designing and implementing the most effective rehabilitation strategies for our patients.

Restoration: The Hope and the Hurdle of Recovering Original Function

Restoration represents the recovery of lost function using the original structural elements and operating mode that existed before the vestibular damage. This implies the potential for the peripheral sensory hair cells and vestibular nerve to regenerate, a topic of significant research interest. The article cites the example of patients with vestibular neuritis, where a positive video Head Impulse Test (vHIT) indicating total loss of function for a canal might become negative over time, suggesting a proper restoration in some cases. Furthermore, the exciting development of vestibular neuroprostheses, or vestibular implants, for patients with bilateral vestibular deficits represents a promising avenue for future restoration.

However, restoration is often not entirely possible, depending on the nature and severity of the vestibular damage. Our current ability to promote proper biological regeneration is limited, and even when it occurs (like post-neuritis), it can be a slow process, taking weeks to months. For many patients, relying solely on spontaneous restoration isn't a sufficient path to recovery. This underscores the need for alternative strategies like adaptation.

Habituation: Reducing the Symptom, Not Fixing the Strategy

Habituation, in its strict definition, is the progressive reduction of a response due to the monotonous repetition of the same stimulus until the response diminishes or vanishes. It is typically acquired passively and represents a quantitative variation of the reaction – the goal is "do not respond." The physiological mechanisms involve changes at the synaptic level, including a decrease in excitatory post-synaptic potentials. While exercises like the Habituation Training Program by Norré and Becker or the Brandt-Daroff exercises are often categorized under habituation, the authors suggest these might be more accurately described as desensitization practices. Because they are usually performed actively, they engage feedback and feedforward mechanisms, blurring the lines with adaptation and learning to tolerate abnormal responses rather than purely habituating in the classical sense.

A key con of pure habituation is that it primarily focuses on symptom suppression rather than developing new, functional balance strategies. It teaches the brain to ignore a faulty signal, which can help reduce symptom intensity but doesn't build a robust system capable of effectively compensating for a persistent deficit. This passive process may not lead to proper functional recovery, especially for dynamic tasks. It may not be effective for all types of dizziness if specific movements don't consistently provoke symptoms.

The Power of Adaptation: Learning to Respond Differently and Effectively

Adaptation, conversely, is a learning process acquired actively that involves dynamic interaction with the environment. Unlike habituation's "do not respond," adaptation aims to "respond differently." This occurs through two primary mechanisms: Sensory Substitution, where the brain learns to rely more heavily on other intact sensory systems like vision and somatosensation, and Behavioral Substitution, where new motor strategies are developed to compensate for lost vestibular function, such as generating corrective eye movements (like covert saccades) when the VOR is deficient. Adaptation builds a more robust system capable of functioning effectively despite a persistent deficit, creating a qualitative response variation.

While incredibly powerful, it's worth noting that the effectiveness and the specific strategies used in adaptation can vary widely among individuals, underscoring the need for personalized rehabilitation. Also, adaptation requires active participation and effort from the patient, which can be challenging, and it does not restore the original vestibular function itself, relying instead on the brain's ability to compensate.

Implementing Adaptation in Practice at FYZICAL

In my practice at FYZICAL, our approach, including the FYZICAL-CTSIB framework, heavily emphasizes challenging the patient in ways that promote this crucial adaptation. We use various tools and techniques to encourage the brain to develop new sensory and behavioral strategies. Tools like our Safety Overhead Support (SOS) system allow us to safely challenge balance in ways that would otherwise be unsafe, pushing patients to explore their limits and encouraging their brains to develop new operational modes.

Utilizing Advanced Tools for Optimal Adaptation

We also use advanced tools such as virtual reality goggles to manipulate visual input and create immersive environments that challenge spatial orientation and balance in controlled, progressive ways, promoting sensory re-weighting. Working on complex surfaces further challenges somatosensory processing and forces the brain to adapt its balance strategies by favoring different inputs. Additionally, we use various eye exercises designed to improve gaze stability and coordination, directly targeting behavioral substitution mechanisms like enhancing the VOR or training compensatory saccades.

The Goal: Empowering Patients Through Active, Adaptive Recovery

These methods are all aimed at promoting active adaptation. We understand the roles of restoration and habituation, but actively challenging our patients' systems to encourage neuroplasticity and the development of effective compensatory strategies through adaptation is the most direct path to meaningful functional recovery. Focusing on adaptation empowers patients to participate in their journey actively, leading to more sustainable improvements in balance and a significant reduction in dizziness, allowing them to navigate the world with greater confidence and independence, responding differently and effectively to life's challenges.